Cyber Security Firms Affirm: Cybersecurity and Business Continuity are Two Sides of the Same Coin

The security of business activities is as safe as the backup and recovery systems. Because of this, cyber security firms affirm that cybersecurity and business continuity can no longer be separated. Instead, organizations should incorporate to avoid being at high risk of facing serious operational, financial, and reputational losses.  

Cyber Security Firms

Moreover, continuity infrastructure is becoming a more popular target for threat actors. This is because they have realized that disrupting operations may be more profitable than data theft. Cyber security firms said that the traditional continuity plans that are used to recover downtime can no longer be used in dealing with the current threats. Hence, resilience requires integrated strategies to consider cyber risks. 

Cyber Security Firms Affirm Calculate the Cost of Disruption  

A 2024 data breach report by IBM calculates a worldwide breach average costs $4.88 million. This is the biggest part of business disruption. Cyber security firms say that these numbers may not even be nearly enough if we take into consideration the overall impact of a breach. This is in cases when cybercriminals are targeting disaster recovery and continuity systems in particular. Additionally, failure of operation in one system spreads very fast through interrelated systems. And when the breach happens in a system that holds backup of the information or tools used in the recovery, the financial and operational cost multiplies. Therefore, the question executives ask is no longer whether a disruption will happen. But, rather, whether or not the organization can withstand it and still retain its reputation and market position in case of a breach. 

Limitations of Traditional Business Continuity Plans 

The majority of business continuity plan traditions incorporate the assumption that backup, recovery tools, and means of communication will not be disrupted during an incident. However, cyber security firms warn attackers today take advantage of these assumptions. According to a recent Ransomware Trends Report 2023, the attackers now target backup repositories in 93% of ransomware attacks. As such, maximization of leverage through the compromise of recovery infrastructure leaves organizations desperate, says cyber security firms. This separation of cybersecurity and business continuity as two distinct fields presents opportunities to more advanced attackers. As a response, companies need to combine the two fields in order to have actual operational resilience. 

The Human Factor in Cyber-Resilience 

Even advanced technical controls may break with human pressure. The demands of stress, urgency, and executive requirements may cause the staff to resort to shortcuts in times of crisis. As such, workers can operate personal devices, use credentials, or skip protocols to resume work soon. This does not just amount to training failure but is a natural reaction to stressful conditions. Reports have always shown that the human element in breaches is significant and can escalate dramatically during crises. However, leaders can mitigate this through structured policies, safeguarded procedures, and organizational culture. These must aim at predicting human behavior during stress.  

Architecting Resilient Infrastructure 

Resilience goes beyond glued-on cybersecurity schemes. Cyber security firms say it entails establishing a plan to continue operating under the assumption of breach penetrating the primary systems. It is important to use network segmentation in order to isolate important operations between normal corporate networks and critical ones. Furthermore, attackers should not have direct routes to operational or financial controls through access to email or the file system. Additionally, Zero Trust Architecture needs to be carried out by a full comprehension of operational dependencies to be effectively implemented. 

In the same vein, security measures also need to be specifically applicable to the backup and recovery systems. Investments in backup infrastructure may be invalid in case attackers have continuous access to recovery environments. Companies should also have offline backups, air-gapped recovery, and regular tests of restoration processes in realistic attack conditions to make sure that they are truly continuous. 

Cyber Security Firms and The Cloud Paradox 

Cloud services provide physical redundancy and professional security controls. However, cyber security firms say they also bring on-demand relations to providers and the net. In recent data, it shows that outages are avoidable with better processes and training. As a result, organizations that rely on the procedures of the providers in the cloud environment forming a risk profile that most executives are underestimating. These external dependencies have to be considered in continuity planning and should still be resilient to cyber threats. 

Integration as a Success Factor 

Cybersecurity needs to be incorporated into effective business continuity planning. Communication standards, decision processes, and recovery measures must consider the prevailing of security risks. Cyber security firms say that the first thing is to put operations back on track and then look into security. Current organizations are forced to carry out a forensic analysis and, at the same time, recover the services which should be provided. Therefore, balances the necessity of recovery with the necessity to preserve the evidence and avoid additional compromise. 

Testing for Real-World Readiness 

When continuity and cybersecurity meet, regular testing is necessary. Simulations are to involve active attacks on recovery infrastructure, disabled communication channels, and the presence of key personnel unavailable. Organizations that train on tabletop exercises usually recover in half the time of real incidents. Security professionals need to practice red team exercises, where they strive to break continuity through realistic attack patterns, also to pinpoint concealed vulnerabilities and train teams to operate under high stress conditions. 

The Executive Imperative 

Due to the rapid rise in digital dependency, new technologies such as AI and IoT increase attack surfaces, and integrated planning becomes more important. As such, cybersecurity and business continuity are not disciplines that overlap with each other but are instead two opposing sides of the resilience strategy. These functions are supposed to be a coordinated system that should be planned, implemented, and managed in organizations to ensure that they survive the current cyber threats. Unless executives invest in cyber-resilient continuity strategies, they will have to defend failures to boards, customers, and shareholders. Although threat actors are already taking advantage of the gaps, the organizational preparedness is what defines whether the business stays operational during the attack. 

Do you need more details on how you can protect your business? 

Call us today!